Patent and trademark disputes
Consultation
Analysis of files and materials, risk identification, coordination of the optimal course of action
Selection of relevant information sources, elaboration of the contestation or protection strategy nuances
Preparation of files and materials for a title of protection contestation or defense
Submission of materials, payment of fees, preparation and sending of responses, participation in the meetings
Our patent attorneys have experience of work as the Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property) experts
During the first consultation, we will explain how to protect intellectual property
We have extensive experience in various fields of science and commerce
| Consultation and case analysis | Request |
| Analysis and conclusion on the infringement of patent for an invention/utility model/industrial design/trademark | Request |
| Preparation of an objection, a letter of notification, a letter of claim, a statement of claim to the court, preparation for participation in the meeting | Request |
| Representation in the patent courts | Request |
The works that are not listed shall be agreed individually.
The amounts of fees are not included in the indicated cost.
Leave a message and we will contact you in the closest time!
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation introduced uncertainty into the legal practice of registering trademarks, deciding that Rospatent may refuse to register if, in the opinion of the expert of the Federal Institute for Industrial Property, the designation indicated can be perceived as a type of goods.
The resolution clarifies the procedure for determining jurisdiction of disputes arising from the fourth part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the procedure for resolving disputes arising from agreements referred to in this part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and explains the procedure for resolving disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights and other issues relating to copyright and intellectual property.
The use of keywords (phrases) identical or confusingly similar to another person’s means of personalization, taking into account the purpose of such use, by an advertiser in a contextual advertisement on the Internet as a criterion for its displaying can be recognized as an act of unfair competition.
