Pursuance of patent research, verification of counterparties and employees
Consultation
Preliminary acquaintance with the files and materials, coordination of the patent research type and the reporting document form
Search for the agreed attributes and primary selection of documents
Analysis of the identified relevant information sources according to the specified criteria
Preparation of reporting documents
Our patent attorneys have experience of work as the Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property) experts
During the first consultation, we will explain how to protect intellectual property
We have extensive experience in various fields of science and commerce
| Patent purity | from 3Request |
| Background art | Request |
| Control over patent activity (competitors/employees) | Request |
| Analysis of products for the possible production by the customer without violating the third-party patent rights | Request |
| Other types of patent research | Request |
| Verification of the entities and individual entrepreneurs | Request |
The works that are not listed shall be agreed individually.
The amounts of fees are not included in the indicated cost.
Leave a message and we will contact you in the closest time!
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation introduced uncertainty into the legal practice of registering trademarks, deciding that Rospatent may refuse to register if, in the opinion of the expert of the Federal Institute for Industrial Property, the designation indicated can be perceived as a type of goods.
The resolution clarifies the procedure for determining jurisdiction of disputes arising from the fourth part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the procedure for resolving disputes arising from agreements referred to in this part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and explains the procedure for resolving disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights and other issues relating to copyright and intellectual property.
The use of keywords (phrases) identical or confusingly similar to another person’s means of personalization, taking into account the purpose of such use, by an advertiser in a contextual advertisement on the Internet as a criterion for its displaying can be recognized as an act of unfair competition.
